|
Post by BloodyEyes on Jun 3, 2003 16:42:39 GMT -5
Why does this game as very poor graphics even for Dreamcast?
|
|
|
Post by theeldergodofice on Jun 3, 2003 17:02:05 GMT -5
I dont think the graghics are that bad.........
|
|
|
Post by BloodyEyes on Jun 4, 2003 3:20:54 GMT -5
yeah, but they're no match for soul calibur. No way
|
|
|
Post by Nemesi on Jun 4, 2003 7:44:14 GMT -5
They did their job really! Besides, the dreamcast graphics were way better than those on the N65 and PSX
|
|
|
Post by BloodyEyes on Jun 4, 2003 13:33:24 GMT -5
Maybe the screenshots I saw were from other versions! You're probably right
|
|
|
Post by theeldergodofice on Jun 4, 2003 16:56:24 GMT -5
I am always right!
|
|
|
Post by Nindz on Jun 8, 2003 10:46:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SubZero7th on Jun 27, 2003 17:31:14 GMT -5
yeah, but they're no match for soul calibur. No way The graphics on SC beat MKG's graphics, but MK has qualities that SC doesn't have.
|
|
|
Post by Nindz on Jun 27, 2003 18:44:16 GMT -5
ive never played SC so i wouldnt know to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by SubZero7th on Jul 1, 2003 20:10:23 GMT -5
ive never played SC so i wouldnt know to be honest. I've only played SC and SC2 in the arcades. From what I've experienced, it's a pretty good game with fluid gameplay and pretty good graphics. I'm not sure I like the feel of the game, but then again, I have to play the game more and I should try and find a way to play the console versions of these two games.
|
|